Healthy Debate
  • Search
  • Health topics
  • Debates
  • Special Series
  • All topics
  • All articles
Most popular today
  • COVID-19 (551)
  • Vaccines (132)
  • Opioids (44)
  • Cancer (145)
  • Addiction (156)
  • Racism (36)
  • Alcohol (23)
  • Infectious Disease (653)
  • Marijuana (22)
  • Tobacco (20)
  • Aging (196)
  • Dementia (40)
  • Long-Term Care (78)
  • Children and Youth (265)
  • Education (345)
  • Medical Education (175)
  • Depression (25)
  • Misinformation (87)
  • Nursing (27)
  • End of Life (124)
  • In Memoriam (5)
  • MAiD (30)
  • Environment (64)
  • Climate Change (32)
  • About
  • Subscribe
Opinion
Nov 28, 2022
by Manjot Sandila Omouyi Omoike

‘Please don’t come back’: Using virtual care to prevent readmissions

0 Comments
Share on:

Tim’s wound was gaping when I saw it. As Tim’s primary nurse, I helped settle him into his room after he arrived at the southern Ontario hospital via air ambulance. Tim had undergone open-heart surgery the month prior and had left the unit more than three weeks earlier with a well-aligned, healthy-looking breastbone incision.

Although Tim was stoic, that same incision was now gaping and oozing. I asked myself what could have led to this. Was the education provided during his post-operative care insufficient? Was the discharge teaching overwhelming or unclear? Was Tim unable to see his family physician or specialist doctors at the recommended times for follow-up? Living in a remote Northern Ontario community, Tim’s access to health care was not ideal. I could not help but wonder how such complications could have been prevented.

In Canada, one in 11 patients is readmitted within 30 days of being discharged from hospital, costing the country $2.3 billion a year. Furthermore, the risk of readmission is 14 per cent higher for patients in poorer neighbourhoods than those in more affluent communities. Tim’s story is a stark reminder that as the health-care system evolves, those at the margins are at risk of being neglected. Innovation must drive system evolution and design to ensure equitable health-care delivery.

One way to decrease readmissions is through virtual care, in which patients interact with one or more health-care providers via videoconferencing, telephone, web-based tools or secure messaging. It strengthens patient engagement, enhances ease of access and convenience, and improves clinical outcomes – all while reducing costs. Hence, it aligns with a value-based model of care and can improve the patient and health-care provider experience.

Canada was an early pioneer in virtual care. A. Maxwell House utilized telephone consultations to follow up with his patients in the 1970s. While the rate of development of virtual-care technologies has varied across provinces since then, the demand and subsequent deployment of digital health solutions have grown steadily. For instance, in 2018, just 3 per cent of Canadians indicated they had used synchronous video consultations, while 6 per cent had used email or messaging to consult with their regular doctor. COVID-19 exponentially increased the need for virtual consultations and follow-ups following discharge. A recent survey showed that Canadians expressed the desire to use email (63 per cent), text messaging (58 per cent) or video (44 per cent) to communicate with their regular doctor.

Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN) was launched in 2006 to harness the potential of virtual care in filling gaps in health-care delivery. It was designed to be rolled out in phases: initially through OTN virtual sites in rural and remote Ontario, then home visits through OTNinvite. The government of Ontario, through the OTN, has recommended using either of two platforms for virtual follow up: eVisit by Novari Health or VirtualCare by ThinkResearch, both funded by the province.

Virtual follow-up has not been widely adopted in Canada yet.

Even so, virtual follow-up has not been widely adopted in Canada yet. There are few centres, however, that have implemented this framework and could serve as examples for others.

In 2019, the University Health Network started “Integrated Care” programs for discharged thoracic, cardiovascular and vascular surgery patients. St. Joseph’s Health System developed an evidence-based integrated care model with excellent results. Each program involves one digital patient record, one care team and one 24/7 phone line for patients and their caregivers. This telehealth program improved patient self-management and satisfaction, and decreased visits to the emergency department as well as hospital readmissions.

Recently, the Ottawa Hospital used a similar framework for its pilot project to optimize “Virtual Recovery After Surgery.” Depending on surgery type, some patients discharged home monitor their blood pressure, oxygen levels, weight and temperature via an app twice daily. In addition, they can connect virtually with their post-surgical care team for up to two weeks following surgery.

Telehealth and virtual follow-up are untapped resources with immense potential to address bottlenecks and pressures in the health-care delivery system. For example, several multinational studies have shown significant reductions in all-cause readmission rates, with a meta-analysis showing a 73 per cent relative reduction in three years. One significant implication is the freeing of hospital beds that would otherwise have been occupied. Furthermore, it conserves human health resources, ensuring that low-risk follow-up consults are carried out quickly and more frequently.

Federal and provincial governments can facilitate the widespread, tangible gains by standardizing policy and adapting virtual care to local contexts. Additionally, there must be consistency in billing, available services, service providers and infrastructure.

Critics have voiced concerns about virtual care’s potential to worsen existing health inequities. Currently, Ontarians in rural, remote, Northern and Indigenous communities lack reliable broadband internet and adequate bandwidth compared to urban centres. About 1.7 million Ontarians, 12 per cent, live in communities without access to minimum internet services, limiting their access to virtual care. To prevent this, Ontario must build on its 2019 broadband and cellular action plan to bridge the divide in broadband availability between rural and urban communities. In addition, priority must be given to underserved communities to ensure equitable access.

Stories such as Tim’s must not be allowed to happen. All stakeholders must fully resolve to ensure that no Canadian is left behind. If we genuinely care, we will ensure that all discharged patients stay healthy, no matter where they live or what ails them.

Once established, these programs should be expanded beyond post-surgical patients nationally to ensure all patients with readmission-prone conditions, such as heart failure, heart attacks and abnormal heart rhythm, are covered. Similarly, virtual follow-up interventions have the potential to snowball into regional care strategies, extending beyond large tertiary hospitals to smaller peripheral community hospitals and, subsequently, homes, empowering patients to contribute to the process of shared decision-making.

Reducing readmission rates through such strategies are specific ways for health-care stakeholders to prove to patients that they are committed to their well-being.

It is because we care that we do not want you to return.

Share on:
Related content
Oct 12, 2022
by Tara Kiran Tara Kiran

Virtual care is here to stay. But what are patients’ expectations?

As we redesign a better primary care system coming out of the pandemic, we need to consider the role of virtual care and what patients will expect.

May 5, 2022
by Negin Nia

Access to virtual care highlights urban/rural divide

The move to virtual care is leaving some communities behind. For rural Canadians, especially those in remote and Indigenous communities, there are obstacles to seeing a doctor both in person and online.

Nov 23, 2021
by Anthony Fong

‘What’s the appropriate amount of virtual care? It’s not zero, and it’s not 100’

Provincial governments are urging family doctors to resume in-person visits, arguing that virtual care increases pressure on ERs and leads to poorer health outcomes. But some doctors counter that it improves accessibility, among other benefits.

Mar 31, 2021
by Samantha Winemaker

The fog of virtual care

In the switch to home care during the pandemic, my patients have been reduced to their diagnosis. The guy with bladder cancer … instead of James with the porcelain dolls.

Authors

Manjot Sandila

Contributor

Manjot Sandila is a registered nurse with experience in critical care, post-anesthesia care, and cardiovascular surgery. She is a candidate for her Master’s in Health Administration at the University of Ottawa.

Omouyi Omoike

Contributor

Omouyi Omoike is a medical doctor with a background in internal medicine and family medicine across two continents and experience working in low- and high-income systems.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

The comments section is closed.

Authors

Manjot Sandila

Contributor

Manjot Sandila is a registered nurse with experience in critical care, post-anesthesia care, and cardiovascular surgery. She is a candidate for her Master’s in Health Administration at the University of Ottawa.

Omouyi Omoike

Contributor

Omouyi Omoike is a medical doctor with a background in internal medicine and family medicine across two continents and experience working in low- and high-income systems.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Donate to Healthy Debate

Your support allows us to publish journalism about healthcare in Canada that is free to read and free to republish. Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate

Join the mailing list

Sign up below to receive our newsletter every Thursday morning.

You can republish our articles online or in print for free. Read more.

Republish us
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact
  • Community Guidelines
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Republish this article

  1. Please use the invisible republishing code below on the page where you republish this article.
  2. Please give credit to Healthy Debate and include a link back to our home page or the article URL . Our preference is a credit at the top of the article and that you include our logo  (available by clicking the link below).

Please read the full set of instructions for republication here.